Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://erepository.fmesinstitute.org/handle/123456789/1666| Title: | What Makes Clinical Research in Developing Countries Ethical? The Benchmarks of Ethical Research. |
| Authors: | Emanuel, E. J. Wendler, D. Killen, J. Grady, C. |
| Issue Date: | 2018 |
| Publisher: | Research Ethics |
| Citation: | Emanuel, E. J., Wendler, D., Killen, J., & Grady, C. (2018). What Makes Clinical Research in Developing Countries Ethical? The Benchmarks of Ethical Research. Research Ethics, 189, 241–248. |
| Abstract: | In the wake of the scandal surrounding the Tuskegee syphilis study, Congress established the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. The commission investigated and made recommendations regarding basic ethical principles guiding research with human beings and the special principles relating to research with fetuses, prisoners, and children. In 1981, on the basis of the National Commission's recommendations, the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) revised and expanded its regulations regarding the protection of human subjects, which were entered into the Code of Federal Regulations (title 45, part 46). In 1991, subpart A . . . |
| URI: | https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315244426-24 https://erepository.fmesinstitute.org/handle/123456789/1666 |
| metadata.fmes.numPages: | 241–248 |
| Appears in Collections: | Ethics |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.