Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://erepository.fmesinstitute.org/handle/123456789/745
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorQuinn, S. C.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-31T13:24:30Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-31T13:24:30Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationQuinn, S. C. (2004). Protecting human subjects: The role of community advisory boards. American Journal of Public Health, 94(6), 918–922.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.94.6.918-
dc.identifier.urihttps://erepository.fmesinstitute.org/handle/123456789/745-
dc.description.abstractIncreasingly, researchers grapple with meaningful efforts to involve communities in research, recognizing that communities are distinct from individuals. We also struggle to ensure that individual participants in research are fully protected. Community advisory boards (CABs) offer an opportunity to adopt a relationships paradigm that enables researchers to anticipate and address the context in which communities understand risks and benefits, and individuals give consent. CABs provide a mechanism for community consultation that contributes to protecting communities and fostering meaningful research. Furthermore, CABs can help us to re-create informed consent as a process. It is critical that we conduct research to understand the role of CABs in the informed consent process.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Journal of Public Healthen_US
dc.titleProtecting human subjects: The role of community advisory boards.en_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
fmes.numPages918–922en_US
Appears in Collections:Books

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.